Compare

Los Angeles Rams vs Washington Commanders

Real survivor-pool comparison built on the same validated tables the team pages use — de-vigged market win probability and equity, spreads and totals, ELO ranks, defense vs position, charted scheme tendencies, recent form and current injuries. Green marks the better league rank.

Week 9 verdict

Rams play Commanders in Week 9

They face each other, so only one can be used this week. On real de-vigged market prices LA carries the higher survivor equity score.

This week

2026 week 9 · de-vigged consensus from live_game_lines + equity_scores

@ WASOpponentvs LA
66.7%Win prob33.3%
0.482Equity score0.268
−4.5Spread11/11 books+4.5
48.5Game total48.5
= 0.000Equity trendsince previous stored snapshot= 0.000

Head-to-head this week

week 9 · Northwest Stadium

Matchup
LA @ WAS
Spread (home)
+4.5 (11 books)
Total
48.5 (11 books)
Kickoff
Sun, 08 Nov 2026 18:00

Opened WAS +4.5, now WAS +4.5 · no spread move yet · Total 51.0 → 48.5 (−2.5)(206 snapshots)

Forecast: 58.4°F · wind 8.4 mph · 0% precip · Clear

Season series

2026 scheduled meetings

Week 9LA @ WASnot played yet

All-time series: 14 meetings · LA 7 — WAS 7. See the full head-to-head history →

Power rating & record

elo through 2026 · week 9

1543.5ELO rating1466.6
#10ELO rank#22
4-4Record2-4-1
NFC WestDivisionNFC East
#3Division rank#3
W +15 · W +14 · L 2 · L 3 · W +4Last 5newest firstW +17 · L 6 · T 0 · L 17 · W +2

Defense vs position

ppr allowed per game · 2026 through week 8 · lower rank = tougher

16.0 · #12vs QB20.0 · #25
19.9 · #10vs RB19.8 · #9
26.8 · #5vs WR33.6 · #18
10.6 · #6vs TE20.7 · #27

Pass rush & primetime — descriptive only

tested and published as flat: neither predicts survivor outcomes beyond the market

1.43 (2026)Sacks / game1.83 (2026)
7.57Pressures / game10
17-17Primetime record2021–2026 standalone windows9-15

Both of these are context, not edge. Our own tests found DL strength (finding #10) and primetime risk (finding #11) statistically flat once the market price is accounted for.

Scheme tendencies — offense

ftn charting · 2025 season · rank 1 = highest rate

50.6% · #4Pre-snap motion42.3% · #18
15.8% · #1Play action11.9% · #11
0.4% · #32RPO6.3% · #12
3.0% · #21Screen pass3.7% · #16
6.0% · #17No huddle50.2% · #1
34.8% · #32Shotgun71.8% · #1

Scheme tendencies — defense

nflverse participation · 2025 season

27.0% · #23Man coverage32.0% · #15
20.8% · #29Blitz (5+ rushers)27.5% · #16
32.1% · #9Pressure31.3% · #14

Injury report

2026 week 9 · nflverse + highlightly

Los Angeles Rams

  • Bill MurrayGuardOut
  • CJ DanielsWide ReceiverOut
  • Colby ParkinsonTEDid Not Participate In Practice
  • Grant StuardLBLimited Participation in Practice
  • Jaylen WatsonCBDid Not Participate In Practice
  • Joe CardonaLSDid Not Participate In Practice
  • Jordan WhittingtonWRLimited Participation in Practice
  • Josaiah StewartLinebackerQuestionable
  • Kam CurlSDid Not Participate In Practice
  • Kamren KinchensSafetyOut
  • Larrell MurchisonDefensive EndOut
  • Matthew StaffordQBFull Participation in Practice

Washington Commanders

  • Charles OmenihuDefensive EndOut
  • Colson YankoffTEFull Participation in Practice
  • Isaac YiadomCornerbackOut
  • Javon KinlawDefensive TackleQuestionable
  • Javontae Jean-BaptisteLinebackerInjured Reserve
  • Jayden DanielsQBFull Participation in Practice
  • Jer'Zhan NewtonDTFull Participation in Practice
  • John BatesTELimited Participation in Practice
  • Sam CosmiGLimited Participation in Practice
  • Shy TuttleDTLimited Participation in Practice
  • Stefon DiggsWRDid Not Participate In Practice
  • Terry McLaurinWide ReceiverOut

Relevant to this matchup

Track your real pool free — 10-day trial, no card →